Good news, but I am curious as to why the scientists used newborns' neuronal stem cells as opposed to embryonic or adult stem cells?
This is not your typical blog. We have recruited scholars and public policy analysts from around the world to provide daily news and commentary on the implications of bioethical issues for women. We hope you’ll bookmark this page and let us know what you think: just click on the comment link at the bottom of each post to join the discussion. To sign up for the WBP newsletter, visit our homepage at www.womensbioethics.org or follow on Twitter at http://twitter.com/khinsch
Thursday, November 08, 2007
Stem Cells May Reverse Alzheimers' symptoms
From the UK's Daily Mail in London, November 7 : Scientists at the University of California in Irvine have for the first time used stem cells to reverse memory problems associated with strokes, Alzheimer's, and degenerative brain disease in mice. The researchers say that the cells repaired damaged parts of the brain and restored lost memory. They believe that their technique may also work on humans. Full article here.
Good news, but I am curious as to why the scientists used newborns' neuronal stem cells as opposed to embryonic or adult stem cells?
Good news, but I am curious as to why the scientists used newborns' neuronal stem cells as opposed to embryonic or adult stem cells?
The "adult stem cells" used were already conditioned to become the type of neurons necessary. The niche depends on other functional cells.
ReplyDeleteMy question, more specifically, is if they used 'newborns' neuronal stem cells', how were they retrieved? Were the newborns killed?
ReplyDelete