Tuesday, November 08, 2005
Ha-ha
This might give you a chuckle: Turns out women enjoy a joke more than men. Brain scans indicate that women's brains react more intensely when the punchline is delivered.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
This is not your typical blog. We have recruited scholars and public policy analysts from around the world to provide daily news and commentary on the implications of bioethical issues for women. We hope you’ll bookmark this page and let us know what you think: just click on the comment link at the bottom of each post to join the discussion. To sign up for the WBP newsletter, visit our homepage at www.womensbioethics.org or follow us on Twitter at http://twitter.com/khinsch
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed on this blog are solely those of the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy positions of the Women's Bioethics Project.
An Award Winning Blog
Subscribe Now
Search This Blog
Followers
FeedBurner FeedCount
Subscribe via email
BlogRoll
- Women's Bioethics Project
- Adventures in Ethics and Science
- American Journal of Bioethics Editors Blog
- Bioethics Calendar
- Bioethics Discussion Blog
- Blazing Indiscretions
- Brainblog
- Business Ethics Blog
- Care to Elaborate
- Center for American Progress
- Center for Genetics and Society Blog
- Feminist Law Professors Blog
- Genetics and Public Health Blog
- Global Bioethics Blog
- The Healthcare Blog
- The Healthcare Advocate
- Health Care Renewal Blog
- Innovation Watch: The Choice Is Yours
- In Search of Enlightenment
- Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies Blog
- International Humanist and Ethical Union website
- Internet Journal of Emerging Medical Technologies
- Medical Journal of Therapeutics Africa
- Medical Writing Blog
- Mindfiles, Mindware and Mindclones
- New Scientist ShortSharpScience Blog
- National Women's Law Center Blog
- Neuroethics Blog
- The Neuroethics Society Blog
- Our Bodies, Our Blog
- Philosophical Comment
- Preemptive Karma
- Reproductive Health Reality Check
- Research Ethics
- Public Health Press
- Science and Society
- ScienceBlogs
- Science Progress Blog
- Scientific American Editors Blog
- Sentient Developments
- So What Can I Do?
- Sufficient Scruples
- A Theology on the Ethics of Love
- Thus Spake Zuska
- Treat Me With Respect
- Udo Schuklenk's Ethx Blog
- What Sorts of People
- Women's Health News
- Women's Health Research
- Women in Science
Blog Archive
-
▼
2005
(120)
-
▼
November
(24)
- Feeling Angry? Good for You!
- A Painful Issue Redux
- First Human Clone Maker Resigns Post
- On this day of Thanksgiving....
- Women trade health for a paycheck
- Malicious modeling?
- Is this what Sister Sledge meant?
- Harvard Bioethcists Discover Social Justice
- Pass the Beano, Please...
- God's Bioethics (part deux) and the Church: The Va...
- Latest installment in Plan B saga
- Selling Human Eggs Illegally
- Pop Culture: Teen Breast Implants
- The Agony and the Ecstasy, Part II
- God’s Bioethics?
- First trimester Down syndrome testing now available
- Good News for Java Lovers
- Ha-ha
- Caught in the Schiavo echo chamber
- Clinical Trials in India
- Good for the Goose, Good for the Gander?
- What does UNESCO have to say about bioethics?
- Hubris replaces paternalism as 21st century medica...
- International Consensus Statement of Women’s Health
-
▼
November
(24)
Progressive Women"s Blog Ring
VerveEarth
Blog Disclaimer
The opinions expressed on this website are solely those of the contributors, and are NOT representative in any way of their employers or the Women's Bioethics Project.
The authors retain all copyright through the terms of the Creative Commons license on the site, and thus may use or publish any post elsewhere in compliance with U.S. copyright law. The information on this site is intended for educational discussion purposes only, and not as recommendations on how to diagnose or treat illnesses.
Nothing on this website constitutes legal, medical, or other professional advice. In addition, nothing on this blog serves to create any kind of professional relationship whatsoever.
No confidential patient or research subject information held by any author of any posting will be placed on the blog, nor should any information you post in comments or email written to the authors or managers of the blog, authors of its postings, in comments, to management, or to our design or technical support staff be considered confidential. Do not post or otherwise utilize confidential information of any kind on this site.
The authors retain all copyright through the terms of the Creative Commons license on the site, and thus may use or publish any post elsewhere in compliance with U.S. copyright law. The information on this site is intended for educational discussion purposes only, and not as recommendations on how to diagnose or treat illnesses.
Nothing on this website constitutes legal, medical, or other professional advice. In addition, nothing on this blog serves to create any kind of professional relationship whatsoever.
No confidential patient or research subject information held by any author of any posting will be placed on the blog, nor should any information you post in comments or email written to the authors or managers of the blog, authors of its postings, in comments, to management, or to our design or technical support staff be considered confidential. Do not post or otherwise utilize confidential information of any kind on this site.
No comments:
Post a Comment