5 technologies that improve mankind, maybe a little too much?
Thursday, January 17, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
This is not your typical blog. We have recruited scholars and public policy analysts from around the world to provide daily news and commentary on the implications of bioethical issues for women. We hope you’ll bookmark this page and let us know what you think: just click on the comment link at the bottom of each post to join the discussion. To sign up for the WBP newsletter, visit our homepage at www.womensbioethics.org or follow us on Twitter at http://twitter.com/khinsch
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed on this blog are solely those of the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy positions of the Women's Bioethics Project.
An Award Winning Blog
Subscribe Now
Search This Blog
Followers
FeedBurner FeedCount
Subscribe via email
BlogRoll
- Women's Bioethics Project
- Adventures in Ethics and Science
- American Journal of Bioethics Editors Blog
- Bioethics Calendar
- Bioethics Discussion Blog
- Blazing Indiscretions
- Brainblog
- Business Ethics Blog
- Care to Elaborate
- Center for American Progress
- Center for Genetics and Society Blog
- Feminist Law Professors Blog
- Genetics and Public Health Blog
- Global Bioethics Blog
- The Healthcare Blog
- The Healthcare Advocate
- Health Care Renewal Blog
- Innovation Watch: The Choice Is Yours
- In Search of Enlightenment
- Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies Blog
- International Humanist and Ethical Union website
- Internet Journal of Emerging Medical Technologies
- Medical Journal of Therapeutics Africa
- Medical Writing Blog
- Mindfiles, Mindware and Mindclones
- New Scientist ShortSharpScience Blog
- National Women's Law Center Blog
- Neuroethics Blog
- The Neuroethics Society Blog
- Our Bodies, Our Blog
- Philosophical Comment
- Preemptive Karma
- Reproductive Health Reality Check
- Research Ethics
- Public Health Press
- Science and Society
- ScienceBlogs
- Science Progress Blog
- Scientific American Editors Blog
- Sentient Developments
- So What Can I Do?
- Sufficient Scruples
- A Theology on the Ethics of Love
- Thus Spake Zuska
- Treat Me With Respect
- Udo Schuklenk's Ethx Blog
- What Sorts of People
- Women's Health News
- Women's Health Research
- Women in Science
Blog Archive
-
▼
2008
(473)
-
▼
January
(67)
- Friday, Feb 1st - Paint the Town Red!
- Tainted Drugs*
- Policy briefing: requiring individual health insur...
- Why Sex Matters for Neuroethics...
- Tooting our own horn . . .
- When is a Painkiller Not a Painkiller? A Patient'...
- Religion of the Father?
- The Enhanced Ethicist
- Fiction or...?
- Reducing the use of animals in research
- Women Targeted: The Pornographic Gaze
- do you sing the body electric?
- Nature Doesn't Let Medicine Show Her Up
- Yet another argument against conscientious objecti...
- Here's a scary Headline: Teenagers, Scalpels, and ...
- Headgear that could reverse Alzheimers?
- Breast reconstruction and infection: you be the j...
- The Upside to Aging?
- New Vistas in Mapping the Genome of Life
- Blue Cross Proposes Their Own Fix For Uninsured Am...
- Happiness, Now With a Price
- Major Breakthrough for Transplant Patients
- In Blogging, Big is In
- Are you an obnoxious patient?
- Treating the Dead and Redefining Death
- Should genetic researchers be able to share your DNA?
- Embryonic Stem Cells for Therapeutic Cloning in Hu...
- Bobby Fisher, Bioethics, and Asperger's
- UK will allow human-animal hybrids for stem cell r...
- 2008 State of the States
- More on Big Pharma and Disclosure
- Do You Have a Fear Of Clones?
- Closing the Loopholes for Big Pharma
- UCSF Scrambles to Undo Damage
- Live Streaming Video from the NC Science Blog Conf...
- Biobanking and you
- Bark, Bark, Woof, Woof -- Lassie Speaks
- Medical FICO Scores
- Supremes tell Abigail no: why this is a good thing
- Of Note: Five Bionic Technologies, Changing our hu...
- NYS Supreme Court Case Stirs Ethical Debate
- As they say in Hollywood, "It's just an honor to b...
- Goats in the Road and their cloned CAFO cousins
- Casual Contact MRSA
- Which comes first, the drug or the disease?
- Better Schooling Through Biology
- The "Stuff" of Morality: Is it Instinct or More?
- The Drama Surrounding “the Juice of Youth”: The FD...
- The Bitterly Unfair Truth of Sexuality
- Help your doc help you....
- Should Children be Vaccinated against Addiction?
- The Human Side, or the Female Side?
- "We" not "She" had an abortion
- US healthcare: we spend and spend, but....
- (Lack of) Popularity Linked to Obesity?
- One Stop Medical Shopping: Convenience and much more
- Gender: Love It or Kill It?
- More on the mind-body connection
- Scientists Restore Walking In Mice After Spinal Co...
- Amnesty for War Crimes -- even Healthcare Worker W...
- Having Cake is Different From Eating Cake
- A Modern Day "Handmaid's Tale"?
- Generations Ahead
- Big Pharma and Informed Consent
- Saving the World, One Technology At A Time
- Botox in Bali
- Happy New Year: A Celebration of Hope
-
▼
January
(67)
Progressive Women"s Blog Ring
VerveEarth
Blog Disclaimer
The opinions expressed on this website are solely those of the contributors, and are NOT representative in any way of their employers or the Women's Bioethics Project.
The authors retain all copyright through the terms of the Creative Commons license on the site, and thus may use or publish any post elsewhere in compliance with U.S. copyright law. The information on this site is intended for educational discussion purposes only, and not as recommendations on how to diagnose or treat illnesses.
Nothing on this website constitutes legal, medical, or other professional advice. In addition, nothing on this blog serves to create any kind of professional relationship whatsoever.
No confidential patient or research subject information held by any author of any posting will be placed on the blog, nor should any information you post in comments or email written to the authors or managers of the blog, authors of its postings, in comments, to management, or to our design or technical support staff be considered confidential. Do not post or otherwise utilize confidential information of any kind on this site.
The authors retain all copyright through the terms of the Creative Commons license on the site, and thus may use or publish any post elsewhere in compliance with U.S. copyright law. The information on this site is intended for educational discussion purposes only, and not as recommendations on how to diagnose or treat illnesses.
Nothing on this website constitutes legal, medical, or other professional advice. In addition, nothing on this blog serves to create any kind of professional relationship whatsoever.
No confidential patient or research subject information held by any author of any posting will be placed on the blog, nor should any information you post in comments or email written to the authors or managers of the blog, authors of its postings, in comments, to management, or to our design or technical support staff be considered confidential. Do not post or otherwise utilize confidential information of any kind on this site.
No comments:
Post a Comment