data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/69081/6908147388f0ea6debd9389eeed07f47af32b72b" alt=""
What this new silicon womb is, is actually a vaguely IUD looking tube that allows fertilized embryos to be matured inside a silicon tube placed inside the woman's womb, rather than a test tube incubator, before being removed after 2-5 days and then transferred back into the uterus.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/442b0/442b0570a67bf4221c1734e4bd1b31bad1793a5b" alt=""
Of course, the silicon tube insert is only approximating a more natural environment - the uterus is an equally foreign place to embryos that are only a few days old; they would typically be floating their way lazily through a fallopian tube at this stage of development. Still, there's no arguing the point that, so far as mimicing natural goes, a uterus is probably a lot closer than a laboratory incubator.
I am, perhaps not surprisingly, a little more interested - and concerned - about the ethical concerns around this. There is already a large debate about what to do with IVF embryos that are leftover from a successful implantation cycle, with debates about their personhood and agency and whether they should be utilized for stem cell research or adopted out as snowflake children, or disposed of as human waste. What sort of attachment is a woman (and/or her partner) going to develop to a bunch of embryos that are actually being housed and growing inside of her, before being removed to be sorted and determined which should continue growing inside of her? While I've never had a child myself, I have heard many of my parent-friends talk about the incredible attachment and overwhelming love that they develop upon realizing they've conceived. Will those feelings be muted or mitigated by this artificial conception? Or will they develop stronger ties towards multiple embryos that cannot possibly be carried to term at the same time? From the sounds of it, the tubes can carry anywhere from 4-12 fertilized eggs; what happens to the unused, and what's the emotional ramification?
The medical implications are interesting, but it's the ethical ones that are fascinating - and sadly, don't appear talked about in any of the literature I've found about this new way of IVF embryo maturation.
-Kelly
images from Anecova
2 comments:
Not yet, any way -- give it a few months! Maybe someone will suggest it for the ASBH meeting in Cleveland in October! (See http://www.asbh.org)
I continue to be utterly astounded at how disconnected every single post you make on this site is from the actual experience of infertile couples - and the lack of understanding of the basics of the biology of reproduction. No implantation = no viable pregnancy - ever.
The reality is that a lot of things that you find so scary and frightening have a long literary history in the genre of science fiction. And, honestly, that is the genre of today. Only the ignorant allow fear to rule them.
You may want to pick up the Miles Vorkosigian series by McMasters-Bujold if you want a rational dissection of all kinds of not-so-far-fetched technology and its ramifications. She used fertility and fetal rescue as a backdrop for cultural clashes basing things on her actual experiences working in the medical field.
Really, what are you so afraid of?
Post a Comment